Vatican to Allow Trump to Choose American Bishops.
He's certainly more qualified than Chinese Communist Murdering Dictators. Or (sadly) the current batch of Romans.
Conquered by Love
Thursday, October 4, 2018
The Scorzelli Crozier Has Nothing on This Monstrosity
If you haven't already seen the youth synod papal crozier, brace yourself before you click on this link.
I long for the days when I referred to the Romans as 'wizards' and it was satire.
Monday, October 1, 2018
The Red Hat Report
This ought to be interesting: A group of wealthy Catholics are putting together a "watchdog" group that will publish a lavender mafia list by April of 2020.
The Red Hat Report, dubbed as the group’s “flagship project,” is designed to audit all 124 current papal electors. Organizers say it will be conducted by a team of, to date, nearly 100 researchers, academics, investigators, and journalists, with the aim “to hold the hierarchy of the Catholic Church accountable for abuse and corruption, and to develop and support honesty, clarity, and fidelity in Church governance.”Finally. I've been asking them to put their money into private investigators for 20 years.
Let's think about how this will play out.
Right now, Nighty Nights Tobin tweets his kissy face message to Baby and the Holy Father appoints him to a youth synod. Thousands of Catholic lay people point out the red flags and dangers of appointing him to a youth synod. The Holy Father and his see of bishops announce that excepting when they use social media and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass to caricature you as beezlebub, they will continue to say and do nothing when we object to their corruption and defilement of our people. If Tobin gets caught 20 years from now, the lavender mafia will initiate another apology tour and tell us they're going to get together when the pigs fly to refine flow charts on procedures.
Here's what happens when you have a wealthy group of donors willing to hire private detectives:
Nighty Nights Tobin tweet goes out to Baby. A private investigator is hired. The identity of Baby is confirmed within a few weeks. As a result of that investigation, we either learn Tobin does indeed engage in romantic banter with his sister using a baby talk or suspicions about Baby being his sexual lover are confirmed. They express shock and Nighty Nights Tobin is taken out of circulation.
Mission accomplished in a matter of weeks.
Here's another way to use this group:
When the Holy Father names suspicious priests/bishops to run a youth synod, etc., the group deploys a fleet of private investigators to get the dirt long before the youth synod happens. Believe me when I say this would only have to be done once before the Holy Father and Holy See would stop appointing the lavender mafia to anything.
What are the chances Pope Francis would give a priest like Fr. James Martin a leadership position in the articulation and communication of his approval of heresy if he knew Catholics would get to the bottom of finding out the root of poisonous tree within a few weeks of that appointment?
If every time a bishop appoints a suspected member of the lavender mafia to 'teach' at the seminary, or to his cabinet or puts him into the pipeline for elevation - and it gets exposed, there is a very high likelihood they will avoid scandal by making better choices.
Not to mention the report will keep the see from elevating another member to the Chair of Peter.
I am not imply the Holy Father is gay. It's irrefutable he's an enabler, elevator and fierce protector of the lavender mafia and their agenda. This fiefdom effectuates the poisoning of our children's minds. If he isn't gay, he might as well be.
It's painful to accept the reality there is no other alternative. We've exhausted every internal forum decades beyond the tolerance that left countless victims into the hands of predators. From the treatment of the dubia, Archbishop Vigano to the Fr. Walter Cuenin debacle, it's crystal clear the corruption has consumed any reasonable honest attempts to stop sexual and spiritual predators.
It was a terrible disservice to Christ that we let it get all the way to the Chair of Peter. But, better late than never.
Yet it is not our part to master all the tides of the world,
but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set,
uprooting the evil in the fields that we know,
so that those who live after may have clean earth to till.
What weather they shall have is not ours to rule.”
― J.R.R. Tolkien
Saturday, September 29, 2018
Thinking the Unthinkable Prospect of a Pope Promulgating Doctrinal Errors
The following article is written by Fr. Jerry Pokorsky, who is well-known to be humble, faithful, rational, reasonable, patient and spiritually-sound priest:
Until very recently, the prospect of a pope promulgating significant doctrinal error was unthinkable. But many of us are now fretting about ambiguous papal pronouncements said to be “authentic magisterium” that directly oppose Scripture and Tradition.
It's not an article written by a nobody blogger. When the things you say and don't say contradict Church teaching as pope and you lose the confidence of average local faithful parish priests, you've done irreparable harm to the communion of Christ's Church.
But, I do want to emphasize something father says:
I don't know of any solid catechized Catholic who is concerned about the Church. The Church, as Truth and Christ Himself, is incapable of destruction.
Enemies can kill Him, but He/Truth/the Church rise from the grave. Our concerns are about the people tricked by the treachery and consequently robbed of salvation right before our eyes.
The friend in a second marriage whom we spent years gently teaching about the importance of annulment and consecration/validation with a Sacramental marriage whom the pope has convinced is not necessary.
The incalculable number of gays who believe the pope thinks gay sex and marriage is ok.
The number of relatives, neighbors, friends who think the pope has taught pagan/false religions are a path to salvation, living together is ok, contraception is ok and other heresies this papacy has promulgated.
The number of families convinced by the pope that their parents and family members who object to living together, gay marriage - etc - are people who hate them.
I could go on and on about the painful consequences to PEOPLE we love and care about, but I'm preaching to the choir here.
Suffice it to say, our rift with the pope is over hundreds of thousands of immortal souls of people we deeply love. With respect to those very real and painful situations, the fact that the pope cannot do irreparable damage to Christ and Truth brings us no consolation.
Until very recently, the prospect of a pope promulgating significant doctrinal error was unthinkable. But many of us are now fretting about ambiguous papal pronouncements said to be “authentic magisterium” that directly oppose Scripture and Tradition.
It's not an article written by a nobody blogger. When the things you say and don't say contradict Church teaching as pope and you lose the confidence of average local faithful parish priests, you've done irreparable harm to the communion of Christ's Church.
But, I do want to emphasize something father says:
Of course, deliberate ambiguities in papal teaching, incompetence, and infidelity that tamper with the “authentic magisterium” would be disastrous: sowing confusion and even suggesting the unthinkable, that the gates of Hell have prevailed in the Church.
But this cannot be the case as a matter of logic. The truth of Christ remains. His Gospel is handed down in Scripture, Tradition – and the cumulative magisterial teaching of popes, bishops, councils, and synods throughout historyI realize this pastoral attempt to calm scandalized people and he later acknowledges and explains how difficult a situation is to try to overrule heresy from a pope, but I want to make sure we keep the emphasis on the right scandal.
I don't know of any solid catechized Catholic who is concerned about the Church. The Church, as Truth and Christ Himself, is incapable of destruction.
Enemies can kill Him, but He/Truth/the Church rise from the grave. Our concerns are about the people tricked by the treachery and consequently robbed of salvation right before our eyes.
The friend in a second marriage whom we spent years gently teaching about the importance of annulment and consecration/validation with a Sacramental marriage whom the pope has convinced is not necessary.
The incalculable number of gays who believe the pope thinks gay sex and marriage is ok.
The number of relatives, neighbors, friends who think the pope has taught pagan/false religions are a path to salvation, living together is ok, contraception is ok and other heresies this papacy has promulgated.
The number of families convinced by the pope that their parents and family members who object to living together, gay marriage - etc - are people who hate them.
I could go on and on about the painful consequences to PEOPLE we love and care about, but I'm preaching to the choir here.
Suffice it to say, our rift with the pope is over hundreds of thousands of immortal souls of people we deeply love. With respect to those very real and painful situations, the fact that the pope cannot do irreparable damage to Christ and Truth brings us no consolation.
Corrections may also come from the faithful who are, after all, endowed with the sensus fidei (sense of the faith). But the elimination of doctrinal distortions and errors (and restoration of doctrinal clarity) is difficult. As widespread clerical dissent from Humanae Vitae demonstrates, doctrinal repair and restoration can lead to generations of painful conflict.Pope Francis is able to lead people into temptation, sin and hell - and that is precisely what he is doing.
Friday, September 28, 2018
Justice Kavanaugh's Nomination Process
I wanted to share a few thoughts on the events unfolding in our government.
The conduct of the democrats reached a new level of demonic and despicable. Here's what bothers me about this situation. Kavanaugh was a white, wealthy conservative Catholic virgin who went to Mass, played sports, studied his butt off. He went on to serve his country, community and Church with decency and honor. For decades.
Along comes a woman who accuses Brett of sexual assault 38 years ago. But her account of this event demonstrates that her memory is either severely impaired or she is lying. My personal opinion is the latter. She 'forgets' key facts which would make her story gel.
She remembers a general part of town which the assault took place which is nowhere near where she lived. As a 15 year old who didn't drive, she would have needed to get there by car. But she forgets who drove her there. She forgets who hosted the party. She forgets the location of the house. She forgets who was there.
She names people as 'witnesses' she 'remembers' were at the party. She names a person as 'witness' who she says stood in the room as a bystander as she was sexually assaulted. All of these people are contacted and all four people say no such party took place in the location she describes, they were not there, the accused was not there.
Fatal flaws to her memory and credibility.
She claims she gets away from Brett and Mark, runs out of the house but does not call the police. Instead, she leaves her female friend to fend for herself. She doesn't call her friend the next day to find out how she made out in a house with two supposed rapists.
Though the distance would have required her to get a ride in a car home, she forgets who drove her home.
She was caught lying about witnesses. She was caught lying about a bystander in the room and eyewitness to the sexual assault. She was caught lying about a 'fear of flying'. When asked by the prosecutor under oath as to why her own witnesses say there was no such party, she gets caught in a lie about 'health problems' being a reason the witness, her own friend, is contradicting her.
She is caught admitting Feinstein got her the lawyers. She admits she doesn't know who is paying for Feinstein's lawyer or her polygraph (which has its own problems)
She doesn't mention anything to anyone about this incident until 2012, when her husband dragged her to a shrink for unstable behavior.
Any reasonably honest and just person would admit if Kavanaugh were their husband or son, they would feel strongly he was an innocent victim of a mentally unstable person or liar. This is not a serious or credible allegation.
But, our country is now willing to lynch an innocent person for the political purposes. This is a devastating advance in debauchery of not only governmental powers, but of American citizens who are willing to go along with it. It actually exposes something I believe to be an enormous threat to our liberty and our lives.
If American citizens are willing to do this, we are a lot closer to the point in time when they will not hesitate to jail or kill us because they oppose our moral convictions.
This is exactly what Christ warned us would happen.
It is the end of due process. The end of the presumption of innocence.
An insidious development.
The conduct of the democrats reached a new level of demonic and despicable. Here's what bothers me about this situation. Kavanaugh was a white, wealthy conservative Catholic virgin who went to Mass, played sports, studied his butt off. He went on to serve his country, community and Church with decency and honor. For decades.
Along comes a woman who accuses Brett of sexual assault 38 years ago. But her account of this event demonstrates that her memory is either severely impaired or she is lying. My personal opinion is the latter. She 'forgets' key facts which would make her story gel.
She remembers a general part of town which the assault took place which is nowhere near where she lived. As a 15 year old who didn't drive, she would have needed to get there by car. But she forgets who drove her there. She forgets who hosted the party. She forgets the location of the house. She forgets who was there.
She names people as 'witnesses' she 'remembers' were at the party. She names a person as 'witness' who she says stood in the room as a bystander as she was sexually assaulted. All of these people are contacted and all four people say no such party took place in the location she describes, they were not there, the accused was not there.
Fatal flaws to her memory and credibility.
She claims she gets away from Brett and Mark, runs out of the house but does not call the police. Instead, she leaves her female friend to fend for herself. She doesn't call her friend the next day to find out how she made out in a house with two supposed rapists.
Though the distance would have required her to get a ride in a car home, she forgets who drove her home.
She was caught lying about witnesses. She was caught lying about a bystander in the room and eyewitness to the sexual assault. She was caught lying about a 'fear of flying'. When asked by the prosecutor under oath as to why her own witnesses say there was no such party, she gets caught in a lie about 'health problems' being a reason the witness, her own friend, is contradicting her.
She is caught admitting Feinstein got her the lawyers. She admits she doesn't know who is paying for Feinstein's lawyer or her polygraph (which has its own problems)
She doesn't mention anything to anyone about this incident until 2012, when her husband dragged her to a shrink for unstable behavior.
Any reasonably honest and just person would admit if Kavanaugh were their husband or son, they would feel strongly he was an innocent victim of a mentally unstable person or liar. This is not a serious or credible allegation.
But, our country is now willing to lynch an innocent person for the political purposes. This is a devastating advance in debauchery of not only governmental powers, but of American citizens who are willing to go along with it. It actually exposes something I believe to be an enormous threat to our liberty and our lives.
If American citizens are willing to do this, we are a lot closer to the point in time when they will not hesitate to jail or kill us because they oppose our moral convictions.
This is exactly what Christ warned us would happen.
It is the end of due process. The end of the presumption of innocence.
An insidious development.
Archbishop ViganĂ² Again Testifies that Pope Francis Was Informed about McCarrick's Sexual Predation
Ya think told the Holy Father will go another round of slanderous homilies accusing him of being a devil?
Now, the pope’s reply to my testimony was: “I will not say a word!” But then, contradicting himself, he has compared his silence to that of Jesus in Nazareth and before Pilate, and compared me to the great accuser, Satan, who sows scandal and division in the Church — though without ever uttering my name.
If he had said: “ViganĂ² lied,” he would have challenged my credibility while trying to affirm his own. In so doing he would have intensified the demand of the people of God and the world for the documentation needed to determine who has told the truth. Instead, he put in place a subtle slander against me — slander being an offense he has often compared to the gravity of murder. Indeed, he did it repeatedly, in the context of the celebration of the most Holy Sacrament, the Eucharist, where he runs no risk of being challenged by journalists.
When he did speak to journalists, he asked them to exercise their professional maturity and draw their own conclusions. But how can journalists discover and know the truth if those directly involved with a matter refuse to answer any questions or to release any documents?
The pope’s unwillingness to respond to my charges and his deafness to the appeals by the faithful for accountability are hardly consistent with his calls for transparency and bridge building. Moreover, the pope’s cover-up of McCarrick was clearly not an isolated mistake. Many more instances have recently been documented in the press, showing that Pope Francis has defended homosexual clergy who committed serious sexual abuses against minors or adults. These include his role in the case of Fr. Julio Grassi in Buenos Aires, his reinstatement of Fr. Mauro Inzoli after Pope Benedict had removed him from ministry (until he went to prison, at which point Pope Francis laicized him), and his halting of the investigation of sex abuse allegations against Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor.I'm sure you won't find this surprising, but I've had several very faithful Catholic friends over the last 20 years who think I've not always been fair in criticizing heresy or spiritual malpractice of that priest or bishop. A few of them have never said anything critical of a priest or bishop. Never.
Like me, at first, they were reluctant to admit Pope Francis is a menace to the Church and salvation. But, every single one of them have expressed their observation of Pope Francis destruction and lies. For the first time in 20 years, they routinely initiate communications with me with links to the latest scandal and acknowledge the demonic properties.
I know a lot of Catholics. All routinely share stories about how the treachery in Rome affected relatives and friends understanding of sin. I used to think if they really understood the reasons we are all so fed up, the tangible damage to people we love, they wouldn't act this way. They would realize why their old tricks are not going to work anymore. We are watching our relatives get robbed of entry into Heaven and are coming to terms with the reality Pope Francis and his cronies just don't give a flying pig about any of us. That rift with the gypsies, tramps and thieves in the Holy See is irreparable.
I'm starting to wonder what will happen when Pope Francis is dead and gone. Do you think the lavender mafia will persuade the episcopal morons they were able to hoodwink in the last election and get more time and power? Pope Francis is stacking the see with the mafia, so it is possible and even likely.
I continue to hold out hope that if we make it ugly enough, if we tar and feather them, if we publicly expose that we see what they're doing and God sees it too, there is a spark of truth left in their filthy minds and souls. All it takes is a spark.
Much work is ahead of us making them miserable. LOL.
Thursday, September 27, 2018
Boston Archdiocese Refuses to Answer Questions About Priest Sexual Predator
Great coverage on the Walter Cuenin story:
The archdiocese of Boston, Massachusetts is refusing transparency about a priest reportedly removed for homosexual assault.
In another development, in my last post, I published my unanswered email to the Vicar General of Boston.
A buffoon from the Archdiocese anonymously posted in the comments section of the above post and explained the reasons they do not feel obligated to answer Catholics who call begging them to stop sexual and spiritual predators :
AnonymousSeptember 26, 2018 at 9:41 AMHe probably doesn't feel the need to answer a letter from someone who doesn't show any traits of the Holy Spirit, but is obsessed with the actions of others. Maybe he doesn't feel the need to answer someone who sees themselves is a self-appointed policeman/woman of the Church. You keep asking for prayers, but we don't see any fruit of those prayers in your spiritual life or an infusion of the Holy Spirit. Just finger pointing and an obsession with what others are doing.
If you came across as a holy woman, then maybe your would get a response.
ReplyDelete
The Pope Francis fix.
We will not say one word or do anything about our sexual and spiritual predators, but stay tuned for homilies and social media posts explaining why we think victims are no good bums.
At least we finally have some answers on what is going on in the papacy of Pope Francis: The lavender mafia is waiting for us to display the fruit of their prayers.
If they only knew the insurgence to overthrow them is it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Boston Catholic Insider has a new update on Fr. Walter Cuenin story. This is a story very much in progress, so I don't have much to ...
-
Crisis has a good article written by Tony Esolen on the antics of old ladies in the Novus Ordo. I'm an old lady myself, so I couldn...
-
Vatican to Allow Trump to Choose American Bishops. He's certainly more qualified than Chinese Communist Murdering Dictators. Or (s...